Killing Patton (lost production material of cancelled TV movie adaption of Bill O'Reilly novel; 2017): Difference between revisions
Rhino Ryan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{InfoboxLost |title=<center>Killing Patton</center> |image=Killing Patton.png |imagecaption=Cover of the source novel |status=<span style="color:red;">'''Lost'''</span> }} '...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*[http://variety.com/2015/tv/news/bill-oreilly-killing-patton-movie-national-geographic-1201647734/ Announcement article] | *[http://variety.com/2015/tv/news/bill-oreilly-killing-patton-movie-national-geographic-1201647734/ Announcement article] | ||
*[http://tvline.com/2017/06/01/bill-oreilly-killing-patton-cancelled-national-geographic/ Cancellation article] | *[http://tvline.com/2017/06/01/bill-oreilly-killing-patton-cancelled-national-geographic/ Cancellation article] | ||
[[Category:Lost films]] | [[Category:Lost films]] | ||
[[Category:Lost TV]] | [[Category:Lost TV]] |
Revision as of 06:10, 13 August 2017
Killing Patton is a 2014 novel by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard. It is about the death of United States General George S. Patton and presents the theory that he was poisoned by Soviet Union General Secretary Josef Stalin.
O'Reilly, best known for hosting The O'Reilly Factor on Fox News Channel, wrote the Killing series of novels that deal with deaths and attempted assassinations of various historical figures and the ends of historical regimes.
Adaption
On November 24, 2015, a television movie adaptation was announced by National Geographic Channel and Scott Free Productions. The two had previously adapted Killing Lincoln, Killing Kennedy, Killing Jesus and Killing Reagan.
Cancellation
O'Reilly would be fired by Fox News on April 19, 2017 amid sexual harassment accusations. Initially, National Geographic (whose is owned by 21st Century Fox, the same owner as Fox News) planned on going through with the movie.
However, in June 2017, the project was cancelled. The network claimed that the cancellation was not because of O'Reilly's scandal, saying It was in development for a couple of years, and it was difficult project to crack creatively. Like most projects in development, it didn’t go the distance, so we passed on it.