Castle Sinister (lost early British horror film; 1932): Difference between revisions

From The Lost Media Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{InfoboxLost |title=<center>Castle Sinister</center> |image=Castle Sinister.jpg |imagecaption=Except of the review of the movie from the April 1932 edition of ''Bioscope'' |s...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


==Synopsis==
==Synopsis==
What little we know about the plot of ''Castle Sinister'' comes from reviews from the magazines ''Bioscope'' and ''Kenitograph Weekly''. According to a review from the April 1932 edition of ''Bioscope'', ''Castle Sinister'' appears to be a mad scientist movie set in an old castle. The review states that the movie is:
What little is known about the plot of ''Castle Sinister'' comes from reviews from the magazines ''Bioscope'' and ''Kenitograph Weekly''. According to a review from the April 1932 edition of ''Bioscope'', ''Castle Sinister'' appears to be a mad scientist movie set in an old castle. The review states that the movie is:


<blockquote>"The story of a young man's adventures in a large country mansion with a scientist who is engaged in forwarding his theory that rejuvenation by the transfer of certain glands is more than a possibility. A girl is, of course, involved to supply the necessary love interest, and a misshapen creature, victim of the scientist, supplies the thrills."<ref name="bio">[https://archive.org/details/bioscopeapr193291bios/page/n11/mode/2up Edition of ''Bioscope'' that contained a review of ''Castle Sinister''] Retrieved 24 May, '21</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>"The story of a young man's adventures in a large country mansion with a scientist who is engaged in forwarding his theory that rejuvenation by the transfer of certain glands is more than a possibility. A girl is, of course, involved to supply the necessary love interest, and a misshapen creature, victim of the scientist, supplies the thrills."<ref name="bio">[https://archive.org/details/bioscopeapr193291bios/page/n11/mode/2up Edition of ''Bioscope'' that contained a review of ''Castle Sinister''] Retrieved 24 May, '21</ref></blockquote>

Revision as of 03:17, 25 May 2021

Castle Sinister.jpg

Except of the review of the movie from the April 1932 edition of Bioscope

Status: Lost


Castle Sinister is a 1932 British horror film directed by Widgey R. Newman. It was made as a “quota quickie”, which were b-movies made in response to the Cinematographic Films Act of 1927[1]. It was allegedly shown in Liverpool, London, and Manchester in April 1932[2], and is 50 minutes in length. It is believed to be one of the earliest examples of a British horror movie featuring a "mad scientist" type character, in addition to being on of the earliest British horror films.[3]

Synopsis

What little is known about the plot of Castle Sinister comes from reviews from the magazines Bioscope and Kenitograph Weekly. According to a review from the April 1932 edition of Bioscope, Castle Sinister appears to be a mad scientist movie set in an old castle. The review states that the movie is:

"The story of a young man's adventures in a large country mansion with a scientist who is engaged in forwarding his theory that rejuvenation by the transfer of certain glands is more than a possibility. A girl is, of course, involved to supply the necessary love interest, and a misshapen creature, victim of the scientist, supplies the thrills."[4]

Another synopsis was given by the Kenitograph Weekly, stating that:

‘Ronald Kemp, visiting a remote castle, is pressed by his host, a professor, to stay the night. In the course of it, Ronald meets Jean, who entreats him to help her father, who is kept under observation by the professor. This intercourse is watched by an ape-like monster, who jealously attacks Ronald. Jean summons the professor to help; instead he threatens to use Jean for his experiments in brain grafting. The monster then attacks and kills the professor. Jean’s father is freed, and she and Ronald join him in leaving Castle Sinister.’[2]

Reception

Castle Sinister was received poorly by critics at the time. Bioscope stated that Castle Sinister was so "theatrically stages, poorly mounted and lighted and acted with such amateurism that it never for a moment convinces."[4] The Kenitograph Weekly was equally as kind, stating that the film might appeal to an "uncritical audience."[2]

Status

No footage, trailers, stills, or even posters of Castle Sinister are known to survive, and little information exists.

External

Wikipedia article Retrieved 24 May, '21

References